| 1 |
Emacs is a problem for pam? I don’t know why? |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
When I bootstrap a new system and then merge the system. Emacs wouldn't |
| 4 |
be installed. OK, e3 is a link. But what has pam to-do with emacs? |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Please tell me a solution... (if you know) Thanks |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Sebastian |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- |
| 11 |
Von: gentoo-dev-admin@××××××××××.org |
| 12 |
[mailto:gentoo-dev-admin@××××××××××.org] Im Auftrag von Chad Huneycutt |
| 13 |
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 14. November 2001 22:55 |
| 14 |
An: gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org |
| 15 |
Betreff: Re: AW: [gentoo-dev] gcc 3.0.2 system build notes |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Sebastian Werner wrote: |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
>I think you get the pam error with any option in make.conf. I thought |
| 20 |
>It was a problem only on my system, but it seems to be not. I use |
| 21 |
>The pam and pwdb binary-packages form rc5. - ok this is not very clean |
| 22 |
>But work for me! |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
Check your /usr/bin/emacs. I *think* that is what caused this problem |
| 25 |
(I may be confused). When configure looks for emacs, it just looks to |
| 26 |
see if the 'emacs' is in the path, not if emacs is actually installed. |
| 27 |
The problem is that /usr/bin/emacs is a link to e3em on some systems, |
| 28 |
and this causes confuses configure (I can explain more if anyone is |
| 29 |
interested). This may not be the problem here, but it is for some other |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
packages. |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
Chad |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
_______________________________________________ |
| 37 |
gentoo-dev mailing list |
| 38 |
gentoo-dev@××××××××××.org |
| 39 |
http://cvs.gentoo.org/mailman/listinfo/gentoo-dev |
Archives