1 |
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 07:19:48PM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: |
2 |
> On 07/17/2012 07:02 PM, William Hubbs wrote: |
3 |
> > This is basically not relevant since we do not support HURD. |
4 |
> |
5 |
> It is relevant because it guarantees that the GNU stuff in @system will |
6 |
> continue working. That allows us to narrow our focus to the non-GNU |
7 |
> things required to use Gentoo Linux. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Looking at @system and what it typically pulls into @world, the only |
10 |
> thing that might cause a problem is udev, although virtual/dev-manager |
11 |
> is in @system, rather than udev. If that happens, we have a few ways of |
12 |
> dealing with that: |
13 |
> |
14 |
> 1. Patch udev. |
15 |
|
16 |
I think I can come up with a patch locally that will read rules from |
17 |
/lib/udev/rules.d if that's what we want to do for now. |
18 |
|
19 |
> 2. Fork udev. |
20 |
|
21 |
I don't think this is necessary, and it would create more work for us |
22 |
than is needed. |
23 |
|
24 |
> >> Lastly, don't tell me to read systemd's case for why we should break |
25 |
> >> people's systems. I have read it and I find it flawed. There is |
26 |
> >> absolutely no need for us to make this change. |
27 |
> > |
28 |
> > Without elaboration on why you find their case flawed, this sounds |
29 |
> > like the typical, "if it isn't broke, don't fix it" argument. |
30 |
> > While that has merrit, if there are advantages to doing |
31 |
> > something, like I think there would be to doing the /usr merge, it may |
32 |
> > be worth the transition, especially if we can make it as smooth as |
33 |
> > possible. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> The cost to benefit ratio is simply too low for "lets change it because |
36 |
> it could be better this way" to merit making the change. The things that |
37 |
> I have heard are going to break existing systems that I have gone |
38 |
> through some trouble to support. I really don't want to see that. |
39 |
|
40 |
You are still not saying what things you have heard. Your concerns can't |
41 |
be addressed if you don't tell us what they are. |
42 |
|
43 |
William |