| 1 |
On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 11:33:36PM -0400, Michael Mol wrote: |
| 2 |
> > So Debian has a test-gpg function already? Do you know where in their |
| 3 |
> > codebase it is? |
| 4 |
> No idea; a build system I'd cobbled together at the time prodded |
| 5 |
> gpg-agent to get an interactive auth. The build-and-package step took |
| 6 |
> too long, leading to the timeout. And I apologize; I don't remember |
| 7 |
> exactly what I was doing to prod gpg-agent, and since it was for a prior |
| 8 |
> job, I did not retain any copies of any of the materials. |
| 9 |
Aww, thanks anyway. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> If you're not applying to a DVCS, then you risk interleaving commit1 and |
| 12 |
> commit2 with others' work anyway. |
| 13 |
two-phase commit is only where the files in the Manifest will change |
| 14 |
after they are committed. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
commit1 = files + Manifest |
| 17 |
commit2 = files w/ changed keywords + Manifest |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
This is how our existing CVS commits work already. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
If you don't have keywords, or you use thin-Manifest, you only ever need |
| 22 |
one-phase commit. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
Robin Hugh Johnson |
| 26 |
Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead |
| 27 |
E-Mail : robbat2@g.o |
| 28 |
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 |
Archives