Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: William Hubbs <williamh@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2014 16:20:25
Message-Id: 20140726162011.GB13389@linux1
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status by William Hubbs
1 I know I'm replying to my own message, but I do have a concern about
2 this that I want to ask about.
3
4 When a stable request is filed for a package, it is filed for all
5 architectures which have the ~arch keyword for the package and are
6 marked stable or dev in profiles.desc.
7
8 If an arch wants to stay marked stable or dev but only stabilize a
9 subset of packages, I think it is reasonable to drop that arch's
10 keywords from packages they decide not to stabilize rather than move the
11 keywords to ~arch. That makes it obvious that we shouldn't file stable
12 requests on that package for that arch.
13
14 What does everyone else think?
15
16 William

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] About current ppc/ppc64 status "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o>
[gentoo-dev] Re: About current ppc/ppc64 status Michael Palimaka <kensington@g.o>