| 1 |
On 10/20/2013 03:31 PM, hasufell wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 10/20/2013 04:13 PM, Markos Chandras wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On 10/20/2013 01:26 PM, Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим wrote: |
| 4 |
>>>> * not related to the games team * no review whatsoever from any |
| 5 |
>>>> dev on ebuilds that get pushed there |
| 6 |
>>> |
| 7 |
>>> It is easy-fixable. It is enough to gentoo-games team to back to |
| 8 |
>>> work on it together with community. |
| 9 |
>>> |
| 10 |
>>>> * low quality |
| 11 |
>>> low quality of what? ebuilds? I bet, it is many lower-quality |
| 12 |
>>> ebuilds in the tree. Or do you mean low quality of something |
| 13 |
>>> else? Anyway, it is fixable too. Just let's start work on it. |
| 14 |
>>> |
| 15 |
>> I agree. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
>> It's better to work with the user community and join efforts than |
| 18 |
>> having yet-another-shiny overlay. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> Gamerlay is not related to the games team and this thread is not about |
| 22 |
> gamerlay which is a project that has failed. |
| 23 |
> I have zero interest to work on gamerlay. It would have to start with |
| 24 |
> removing direct commit access of users. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
This is not a great way to invite more users to participate. If you |
| 27 |
intend to make the game overlay and team a developer-only thing you are |
| 28 |
doing a great work. |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
> This is a question directed to the games team to revive their overlay |
| 32 |
> and improve workflow (e.g. I have some games ebuilds myself which are |
| 33 |
> still very experimental/alpha in my personal overlay... I'd migrate |
| 34 |
> them there). |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Then you shouldn't have CC'd the gentoo-dev if you are not interested in |
| 37 |
oppinion of the community |
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
|
| 40 |
-- |
| 41 |
Regards, |
| 42 |
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer |
| 43 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang |
Archives