| 1 |
Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> oooooooooh and stop trying to run the `patch` cmd yourself ... |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> no one is cooler than `epatch` (which is integrated into portage now, so dont |
| 6 |
> 'inherit eutils'), so stop trying to think you ppl are |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> -mike |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Isn't the only time we want to avoid this on a kernel ebuild? There was |
| 11 |
an email many weeks ago on -dev I think (mighta been -core) which said |
| 12 |
to avoid using epatch on kernel sources, due to it's brute-force method. |
| 13 |
Also, what about "xpatch"? I had heard of this mechanism used awhile |
| 14 |
ago, but not recently. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
--Kumba |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
-- |
| 19 |
"Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: |
| 20 |
small hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are |
| 21 |
elsewhere." --Elrond |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
-- |
| 25 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives