Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: George Prowse <cokehabit@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June]
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 17:32:45
Message-Id: 48515DB3.1040502@gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] by Luca Barbato
1 Luca Barbato wrote:
2 > Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
3 >> Package manager maintainers refusing to do basic testing before
4 >> claiming support for a new EAPI has very messy consequences. If package
5 >> manager maintainers aren't going to do the responsible thing, the whole
6 >> point of EAPIs is lost.
7 >
8 > Thats a circular argument since portage and pkgcore developers are
9 > complaining about eapi definition and PMS management.
10 >
11 > lu
12 >
13 If the bickering is stopping development then maybe it should be given
14 to a 3rd party to complete and have the last word.
15 --
16 gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>