Archives
Archives
| From: | Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] | ||
| Date: | Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:14:05 | ||
| Message-Id: | 4850DA7F.7030406@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 | > Package manager maintainers refusing to do basic testing before |
| 3 | > claiming support for a new EAPI has very messy consequences. If package |
| 4 | > manager maintainers aren't going to do the responsible thing, the whole |
| 5 | > point of EAPIs is lost. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Thats a circular argument since portage and pkgcore developers are |
| 8 | complaining about eapi definition and PMS management. |
| 9 | |
| 10 | lu |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | |
| 14 | Luca Barbato |
| 15 | Gentoo Council Member |
| 16 | Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
| 17 | http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
| 18 | |
| 19 | -- |
| 20 | gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Agenda [WAS: One-Day Gentoo Council Reminder for June] | George Prowse <cokehabit@×××××.com> |