| 1 |
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 10:12:47 +0200 |
| 2 |
Luca Barbato <lu_zero@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Package manager maintainers refusing to do basic testing before |
| 5 |
> > claiming support for a new EAPI has very messy consequences. If |
| 6 |
> > package manager maintainers aren't going to do the responsible |
| 7 |
> > thing, the whole point of EAPIs is lost. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Thats a circular argument since portage and pkgcore developers are |
| 10 |
> complaining about eapi definition and PMS management. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
Are you seriously suggesting that the portage and pkgcore developers |
| 13 |
think that they should be able to release a package manager that claims |
| 14 |
to support an EAPI when it in fact doesn't? |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives