| 1 |
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 16:37:39 +0000, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 14:47:23 +0000 Chris Bainbridge |
| 3 |
> <chris.bainbridge@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> | What is the current status of gpg signatures? Is gpg signing |
| 5 |
> | documented anywhere? |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> If you'd've followed the -dev and -core lists you'd already know this. |
| 8 |
> All your questions have already been answered. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
The last time this was discussed was the "2004.1 will not include a |
| 11 |
secure portage" thread from March, and before that "GPG Signed |
| 12 |
packages" in November 2003. Neither of them ended in any resolution. I |
| 13 |
remember a few mails on -core about SHA support coming in the future. |
| 14 |
I was hoping there may have been some progress since then. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
(yes, it's possible I missed some thread... you discovered my guilty |
| 17 |
secret - I have more important things in my life than this list) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives