From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaranm@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-security] Trojan for Gentoo, part 2]] | ||
Date: | Sun, 07 Nov 2004 16:39:25 | ||
Message-Id: | 20041107163739.4fc520fc@snowdrop.home | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [Fwd: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-security] Trojan for Gentoo, part 2]] by Chris Bainbridge |
1 | On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 14:47:23 +0000 Chris Bainbridge |
2 | <chris.bainbridge@×××××.com> wrote: |
3 | | What is the current status of gpg signatures? Is gpg signing |
4 | | documented anywhere? |
5 | |
6 | If you'd've followed the -dev and -core lists you'd already know this. |
7 | All your questions have already been answered. |
8 | |
9 | -- |
10 | Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (Vim, Fluxbox, Sparc, Mips) |
11 | Mail : ciaranm at gentoo.org |
12 | Web : http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [Fwd: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-security] Trojan for Gentoo, part 2]] | Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@×××××.com> |