Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Chris Bainbridge <chris.bainbridge@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [Fwd: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-security] Trojan for Gentoo, part 2]]
Date: Sun, 07 Nov 2004 14:47:25
Message-Id: 623652d50411070647470da41a@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [Fwd: Re: [gentoo-dev] [Fwd: [gentoo-security] Trojan for Gentoo, part 2]] by "Stephen P. Becker"
1 I shouldn't have mentioned that old issue. Apologies... Back to the
2 topic at hand.
3
4 What is the current status of gpg signatures? Is gpg signing
5 documented anywhere?
6
7 Can all files be signed, or just ebuilds and eclasses?
8
9 When will signing be enforced?
10
11 Is it possible to reject non-signed ebuilds by default in emerge?
12 Should users start filing bugs for packages that aren't signed to get
13 them signed?
14
15 When can we stop using MD5? How far along is support for SHA?
16
17 Someone mentioned that nobody cares because nobody has stepped up to
18 do it. What still needs to be done? I'm sure that people do care. How
19 can we help?
20
21 Hopefully we can find some positive solutions to get these things
22 fixed and make a more secure gentoo.
23
24 --
25 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies