| 1 |
On Sat, Nov 19, 2005 at 03:27:52PM -0700, Tres Melton wrote: |
| 2 |
> staff.gentoo.org forum staff |
| 3 |
> amd64-at.gentoo.org Arch testers for the amd64 platform |
| 4 |
> contributer.gentoo.org People that donate $$$ to Gentoo |
| 5 |
> retired.gentoo.org A thanks for helping earlier domain |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> For the developers like ferringb, solar, vapier, etc. that have many |
| 8 |
> roles perhaps they could have the subdomains forward to their |
| 9 |
> @gentoo.org address. But then again that complicates things for the |
| 10 |
> -infra team which I don't want to do. That is why I've tried to keep |
| 11 |
> quiet. There is still quite a bit for me to learn. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Easier, and saner to just plain drop the subdomain notion. Avoids the |
| 14 |
whole gentoo personel first class/second class issue first of all, |
| 15 |
second avoids infra aliasing annoyances. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Note also that retired.gentoo.org shouldn't really accomplish |
| 18 |
anything, unless the dev is able to send through the account (if they're |
| 19 |
retired, I would posit they shouldn't be able to). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> deltacow stated that in IRC... and my response to that is: "that is |
| 22 |
> what IRC cloaks are for". Voice is used to mark AT's in #gentoo-amd64 |
| 23 |
> but the voice is used mostly for tor users in #gentoo. I don't want to |
| 24 |
> open a new can of worms by bringing in IRC but there really is no |
| 25 |
> standardization throughout the channels and I think that is the way that |
| 26 |
> most people want to keep it. I'm not suggesting anything until I learn |
| 27 |
> more. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Subject for another glep I'd think, although tbh not something I |
| 30 |
personally have much interest in- rules and conventions across |
| 31 |
channels vary fairly massively. I wouldn't be too happy if the |
| 32 |
language requirement wound up forced on #gentoo-portage for example |
| 33 |
(nor do I suspect would the hardened crowd) :) |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
~harring |
Archives