Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Thomas Rösner" <Thomas.Roesner@××××××××××××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI spec (was Re: Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs))
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2007 13:42:39
Message-Id: 45DD9E1D.3080008@digital-trauma.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI spec (was Re: Re: let's clear things up (was Slacker archs)) by Brian Harring
1 Brian Harring schrieb:
2 > On Thu, Feb 22, 2007 at 04:13:11AM +0000, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
3 >
4 >> On Thu, 22 Feb 2007 04:04:37 +0000 Steve Long
5 >> <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote:
6 >> | > I'm saying that until there is an independent implementation, the
7 >> | > specification is worthless and will contain huge numbers of errors.
8 >> |
9 >> | Seriously? Without an implementation, your spec of what should happen
10 >> | will have loads of errors?
11 >>
12 >> Yes. It will describe what people think is allowed, rather than what
13 >> really is.
14 >>
15 >
16 > If you're writing the spec to match what "people think", why limit the
17 > # of folks involved?
18
19 Uhm, I think you completely inverted what Ciaran meant.
20
21 Regards,
22 Thomas (watching from the peanut gallery)
23 --
24 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies