| 1 |
On Tuesday 04 April 2006 06:52, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 2 |
> sorry, those last two paragraphs are covered elsewhere between infra and |
| 3 |
> evrel ... so the document should be considered without those last two |
| 4 |
> paragraphs |
| 5 |
> -mike |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
This is what I'd like to see clarified. To me, only a decision of the Council |
| 8 |
may lead to such a "suspension", as it is the relevant _elected_ entity. And |
| 9 |
I hereby request to add a paragraph at least, stating exactly this. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Also I do agree with foser and many others about the dubious wording. It can |
| 12 |
be stretched to any extent, if "needed". And I'm not that suspicious, given |
| 13 |
that Infra already acted once, without having any right to do so. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
Carsten |
Archives