| 1 |
On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 11:33:21 -0700 |
| 2 |
Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On 06/25/2013 07:47 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 5 |
> > On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:40:38 -0400 |
| 6 |
> > Michael Sterrett <mr_bones_@g.o> wrote: |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> >> repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > wont this disable important regular checks also? |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> The -I (--ignore-masked) option only disables dependency checks for |
| 14 |
> masked "parent" packages. |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> > foo is masked by package.mask, bar depends on foo. repoman -I wont |
| 17 |
> > catch a broken dep in bar. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> No, we don't currently have an option like that, and I don't think we |
| 20 |
> want one like that. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> > IMHO it should do the -I check in addition to the current ones and |
| 23 |
> > print warnings/errors. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> The -I option only disables checks that are normally enabled. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
ooops yes, thanks. I got confused and thought it was --without-mask... |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
Alexis. |
Archives