| 1 |
On 06/25/2013 07:47 AM, Alexis Ballier wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Tue, 25 Jun 2013 01:40:38 -0400 |
| 3 |
> Michael Sterrett <mr_bones_@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
>> repoman should default to the -I behavior: discuss. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> wont this disable important regular checks also? |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
The -I (--ignore-masked) option only disables dependency checks for |
| 11 |
masked "parent" packages. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> foo is masked by package.mask, bar depends on foo. repoman -I wont |
| 14 |
> catch a broken dep in bar. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
No, we don't currently have an option like that, and I don't think we |
| 17 |
want one like that. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
> IMHO it should do the -I check in addition to the current ones and print |
| 20 |
> warnings/errors. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
The -I option only disables checks that are normally enabled. |
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
Thanks, |
| 25 |
Zac |
Archives