1 |
Ühel kenal päeval, E, 06.04.2020 kell 15:23, kirjutas Pacho Ramos: |
2 |
> El jue, 02-04-2020 a las 16:28 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
3 |
> > Hello, |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > I was reviewing about how to enable globally on my system the usage |
6 |
> > of |
7 |
> > libappindicator and I realized that we have multiple names for that |
8 |
> > in the |
9 |
> > tree. |
10 |
> > "ayatana" is the only global one, while other packages are using |
11 |
> > "indicator", |
12 |
> > "libindicate", "appindicator"... |
13 |
> > |
14 |
> > Personally I would merge all them in only one, and I wonder if |
15 |
> > maybe |
16 |
> > "indicator" |
17 |
> > or "appindicator" would be more meaningful for most users than |
18 |
> > "ayatana", what |
19 |
> > do you think? |
20 |
> > |
21 |
> > Thanks |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Personally I would opt for global "appindicator" as it seems to be |
24 |
> more widely |
25 |
> used and I think it is a bit more self-explanatory :/ |
26 |
|
27 |
So I assume we can consensus here, so I'll start off with renaming it |
28 |
in nm-applet as part of other changes, and assume this ends up as a |
29 |
global USE flag eventually. |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
Mart |