From: | Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] About merging "ayatana", "indicator", "libindicate", "appindicator" in one global USE flag | ||
Date: | Mon, 06 Apr 2020 13:23:53 | ||
Message-Id: | 3cbc3d4eef679e51895f173390985f664ce80778.camel@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-dev] About merging "ayatana", "indicator", "libindicate", "appindicator" in one global USE flag by Pacho Ramos |
1 | El jue, 02-04-2020 a las 16:28 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
2 | > Hello, |
3 | > |
4 | > I was reviewing about how to enable globally on my system the usage of |
5 | > libappindicator and I realized that we have multiple names for that in the |
6 | > tree. |
7 | > "ayatana" is the only global one, while other packages are using "indicator", |
8 | > "libindicate", "appindicator"... |
9 | > |
10 | > Personally I would merge all them in only one, and I wonder if maybe |
11 | > "indicator" |
12 | > or "appindicator" would be more meaningful for most users than "ayatana", what |
13 | > do you think? |
14 | > |
15 | > Thanks |
16 | |
17 | Personally I would opt for global "appindicator" as it seems to be more widely |
18 | used and I think it is a bit more self-explanatory :/ |
File name | MIME type |
---|---|
signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-dev] About merging "ayatana", "indicator", "libindicate", "appindicator" in one global USE flag | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] About merging "ayatana", "indicator", "libindicate", "appindicator" in one global USE flag | NP-Hardass <NP-Hardass@g.o> |
Re: [gentoo-dev] About merging "ayatana", "indicator", "libindicate", "appindicator" in one global USE flag | Mart Raudsepp <leio@g.o> |