| 1 |
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:23 AM Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> |
| 3 |
> El jue, 02-04-2020 a las 16:28 +0200, Pacho Ramos escribió: |
| 4 |
> > Hello, |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > I was reviewing about how to enable globally on my system the usage of |
| 7 |
> > libappindicator and I realized that we have multiple names for that in the |
| 8 |
> > tree. |
| 9 |
> > "ayatana" is the only global one, while other packages are using "indicator", |
| 10 |
> > "libindicate", "appindicator"... |
| 11 |
> > |
| 12 |
> > Personally I would merge all them in only one, and I wonder if maybe |
| 13 |
> > "indicator" |
| 14 |
> > or "appindicator" would be more meaningful for most users than "ayatana", what |
| 15 |
> > do you think? |
| 16 |
> > |
| 17 |
> > Thanks |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> Personally I would opt for global "appindicator" as it seems to be more widely |
| 20 |
> used and I think it is a bit more self-explanatory :/ |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Sounds reasonable to me. |
Archives