| 1 |
* Michał Górny schrieb am 07.09.15 um 17:16 Uhr: |
| 2 |
> Dnia 2015-09-07, o godz. 14:35:07 |
| 3 |
> Marc Schiffbauer <mschiff@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 4 |
> |
| 5 |
> > I'd like to propose a new kind of DEPEND syntax: <> |
| 6 |
> > |
| 7 |
> > This would mean "Any version but the one specified" and is usefull when |
| 8 |
> > you have a dependency on another package but a single version of it is |
| 9 |
> > not compatible for example. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > I currently have this case in app-backup/obnam which is not compatible |
| 12 |
> > to =dev-python/paramiko-1.13.0 |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > In DEPEND I now have this: |
| 15 |
> > |
| 16 |
> > !=dev-python/paramiko-1.13.0 |
| 17 |
> > || ( <dev-python/paramiko-1.13.0 >dev-python/paramiko-1.13.0 ) |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > which does the trick, but I think much more straight forward would be: |
| 20 |
> > |
| 21 |
> > <>dev-python/paramiko-1.13.0 |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> > which would be the exact opposite of =dev-python/paramiko-1.13.0 |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> What if you want to exclude two versions? This looks like an even worse |
| 26 |
> case of the > + < -dep problem. |
| 27 |
> |
| 28 |
> > An alternate syntax would be (but I'd prefer the former): |
| 29 |
> > |
| 30 |
> > !=dev-python/paramiko-1.13.0 |
| 31 |
> |
| 32 |
> This is a blocker syntax, so it's used already. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
OK thanks. And I ignored that fact in one of my other mails. So I guess |
| 35 |
this ends up in: Never mind ;) |
| 36 |
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
|
| 39 |
-- |
| 40 |
0x35A64134 - 8AAC 5F46 83B4 DB70 8317 |
| 41 |
3723 296C 6CCA 35A6 4134 |
Archives