| 1 |
On 09/02/16 23:38, Alex McWhirter wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 02/09/2016 05:39 PM, Duncan wrote: |
| 3 |
>> I'd agree, except that the way we're running udev is strongly discouraged |
| 4 |
>> and generally not supported by upstream, with a statement that it /will/ |
| 5 |
>> break in the future, it's simply a matter of time. |
| 6 |
>> |
| 7 |
>> Which makes a big difference when supporting that same specific use-case |
| 8 |
>> is the primary and arguably only reason the considered alternative exists. |
| 9 |
>> |
| 10 |
>> IOW, it's not about not liking upstream. It's about choosing a default |
| 11 |
>> that supports our default use-case. |
| 12 |
>> |
| 13 |
> My point exactly. When this happens we either make something like eudev |
| 14 |
> default or we have to make systemd default. I don't really care which as |
| 15 |
> long as i still have the option to change it. |
| 16 |
> |
| 17 |
+1 |
Archives