| 1 |
On 02/09/2016 05:39 PM, Duncan wrote: |
| 2 |
> I'd agree, except that the way we're running udev is strongly discouraged |
| 3 |
> and generally not supported by upstream, with a statement that it /will/ |
| 4 |
> break in the future, it's simply a matter of time. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Which makes a big difference when supporting that same specific use-case |
| 7 |
> is the primary and arguably only reason the considered alternative exists. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> IOW, it's not about not liking upstream. It's about choosing a default |
| 10 |
> that supports our default use-case. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
My point exactly. When this happens we either make something like eudev |
| 14 |
default or we have to make systemd default. I don't really care which as |
| 15 |
long as i still have the option to change it. |
Archives