1 |
On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 07:26:42 +1200 |
2 |
Kent Fredric <kentnl@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> On Thu, 5 Sep 2019 09:04:23 -0500 |
5 |
> Gordon Pettey <petteyg359@×××××.com> wrote: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> > You'll note the bit you quoted in defense of skipping review says |
8 |
> > "changes", and the bit about new eclasses says "do not skip this step". |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Emphasis added: |
11 |
> |
12 |
> ----- |
13 |
> BEFORE committing a NEW eclass to the tree, it SHOULD be emailed to the |
14 |
> gentoo-dev mailing list with a justification and a proposed |
15 |
> implementation. DO NOT SKIP this step — sometimes a better |
16 |
> implementation or an alternative which does not require a new eclass |
17 |
> will be suggested. |
18 |
> ----- |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
> If its mandatory, it must say "MUST" not "SHOULD", SHOULD is a |
22 |
> suggestion, following a suggestion with an imperative just adds |
23 |
> predictable confusion. |
24 |
> |
25 |
> Either fix the "should", or drop the "DO NOT SKIP". |
26 |
> |
27 |
> Otherwise you're just giving mixed messages. |
28 |
|
29 |
+1 |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
James Le Cuirot (chewi) |
33 |
Gentoo Linux Developer |