1 |
On Thursday 21 Apr 2005 12:37, Paul Varner wrote: |
2 |
> On Thu, 2005-04-21 at 05:48 +0100, Elfyn McBratney wrote: |
3 |
> > I've filed a bug[1] requesting that ebuilds with updated apache stuff |
4 |
> > (anything using the new apache-module or depend.apache eclass/the new |
5 |
> > install layout) be package.mask'd due to the regressions and breakages in |
6 |
> > testing. I may have missed packages in the bug, hence this mail - you |
7 |
> > know best if your using new stuff. :) |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > Please package.mask said ebuilds ASAP so we can get apache itself into |
10 |
> > package.mask. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Even though I stated my opinion that I would like to see the new changes |
13 |
> package masked again, the consensus that I read on the thread disagreed |
14 |
> with that approach. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> My unsolicited opinion based upon the previous thread is since it is |
17 |
> already out of the bag, leave it in ~arch and actively work the bugs so |
18 |
> that you can get it to the point of being able to mark it stable. |
19 |
|
20 |
Seems, I've been speaking to the wrong people then. Anyways, this has |
21 |
prompted loads of bugs being fixed, which might mean apache will go stable |
22 |
instead. |
23 |
|
24 |
Best, |
25 |
Elfyn |
26 |
|
27 |
-- |
28 |
Elfyn McBratney http://beu.merseine.nu/ |
29 |
beu/irc.freenode.net http://dev.gentoo.org/~beu/ |
30 |
+------------O.o--------------------- http://dev.gentoo.org/~beu/pubkey.asc |
31 |
|
32 |
PGP Key ID: 0x69DF17AD |
33 |
PGP Key Fingerprint: |
34 |
DBD3 B756 ED58 B1B4 47B9 B3BD 8D41 E597 69DF 17AD |