| 1 |
On Monday 30 April 2012 12:32:35 Matt Turner wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Monday 30 April 2012 12:00:59 Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> doing it wrong. I don't like how Google develops Android in the dark, |
| 5 |
> >> or that they bundle 1GB of third-party stuff in their Chromium source |
| 6 |
> >> and distribute a favored binary-only derivative. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> > err, they distribute a Chromium source tarball, and their build system |
| 9 |
> > includes flags to use the system versions of those bundled libs if you so |
| 10 |
> > choose. i think this is a perfectly fine compromise. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> It looks like chromium-20.0.1115.1.ebuild removes 45 bundled |
| 13 |
> libraries |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
to be sure the system ones get used |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> and still has TODOs in place to use the system's ffmpeg, |
| 18 |
> hunspell, (Open?)SSL, SQLite, and libvpx. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
it's on going work :). ffmpeg/libvpx are a bit harder as Chromium syncs faster |
| 21 |
than they make releases i believe. |
| 22 |
-mike |
Archives