| 1 |
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Monday 30 April 2012 12:00:59 Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> doing it wrong. I don't like how Google develops Android in the dark, |
| 4 |
>> or that they bundle 1GB of third-party stuff in their Chromium source |
| 5 |
>> and distribute a favored binary-only derivative. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> err, they distribute a Chromium source tarball, and their build system |
| 8 |
> includes flags to use the system versions of those bundled libs if you so |
| 9 |
> choose. i think this is a perfectly fine compromise. |
| 10 |
> -mike |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
It looks like chromium-20.0.1115.1.ebuild removes 45 bundled |
| 13 |
libraries, and still has TODOs in place to use the system's ffmpeg, |
| 14 |
hunspell, (Open?)SSL, SQLite, and libvpx. |
Archives