| 1 |
On Fri, 20 Jul 2007 11:52:02 +0200 |
| 2 |
Michael Hanselmann <hansmi@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Hello Benedikt |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 01:37:11PM +0200, Benedikt Boehm wrote: |
| 7 |
> > It is basically netqmail split into much smaller chunks so they can |
| 8 |
> > be reused by other qmail variants as well. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Okay, I looked through it and found some things which need |
| 11 |
> reconsideration. I agree that user creation and such things can be |
| 12 |
> easily done in an eclass. However, functions like qmail_src_unpack |
| 13 |
> should be done in the ebuild. Putting them in an eclass and just doing |
| 14 |
> "if (a) { … } else if (b) { … }" makes it harder to understand and |
| 15 |
> unneccessarily complicated. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
i thought about this, but i'd really like to see things like qmail-spp |
| 18 |
and the gentoo qmail tarball be handled by the eclass, on the other |
| 19 |
hand i agree that unpacking netqmail or qmail based on $FOO is not the |
| 20 |
best idea. any suggestions? |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Greets, |
| 24 |
> Michael |
| 25 |
> |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Bene |
| 28 |
-- |
| 29 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives