| 1 |
On Wed, 10 May 2017 01:40:36 +0200 |
| 2 |
"Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> Am Mittwoch, 10. Mai 2017, 00:47:30 CEST schrieb Alexis Ballier: |
| 5 |
> > On Tue, 9 May 2017 23:18:20 +0200 Hanno Böck <hanno@g.o> |
| 6 |
> > wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > I really think it's about time that pie becomes the default in |
| 8 |
> > > Gentoo. |
| 9 |
> > |
| 10 |
> > For a transition we can probably build everything with -fPIE but not |
| 11 |
> > link with -pie. If we want that to happen fast, gcc-6 might do that |
| 12 |
> > and gcc-7 add the -pie option. |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> What do we gain by that? |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Wouldn't we need to rebuild all the static archives afterwards again |
| 17 |
> anyway, just to make sure they have been rebuilt? |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
yep we wouldn't gain much |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
considering gcc unmasks timings, the idea was to have enough time to |
| 23 |
pass for the need to rebuild to be gone |
Archives