Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Marek Szuba <marecki@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts?
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2017 12:45:53
Message-Id: fdc044c5-e290-5a65-3683-545ff78f93bc@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? by "Andreas K. Huettel"
1 On 2017-07-28 12:43, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
2
3 >> I continue to feel that maintaining two worlds (stable+unstable)
4 >> carries with it an unneccessary cost.
5 > That's not feasible. It would kill off any semi-professional or
6 > professional Gentoo use, where a minimum of stability is required.
7 This. VERY much this. I do not care about having all the latest stuff on
8 work machines, what I want them is to a) remain up to date
9 security-wise, and b) actually survive updates. In fact, problems with
10 the latter was what led us a couple of years ago to quickly conclude
11 evaluation of a certain other rolling-upgrade operating system.
12
13 --
14 MS

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature