Archives
Archives
| From: | "Andreas K. Huettel" <dilfridge@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? | ||
| Date: | Fri, 28 Jul 2017 10:44:33 | ||
| Message-Id: | 1931696.H1tAJ0QB7a@porto | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? by Peter Stuge |
||
| 1 | Am Dienstag, 25. Juli 2017, 01:22:44 CEST schrieb Peter Stuge: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > I hold a perhaps radical view: I would like to simply remove stable. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > I continue to feel that maintaining two worlds (stable+unstable) |
| 6 | > carries with it an unneccessary cost. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | |
| 9 | That's not feasible. It would kill off any semi-professional or professional |
| 10 | Gentoo use, where a minimum of stability is required. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | (Try keeping ~10 machines on stable running without automation. That's already |
| 13 | quite some work. Now try the same with ~arch. Now imagine you're talking about |
| 14 | 100 or 1000 machines.) |
| 15 | |
| 16 | -- |
| 17 | Andreas K. Hüttel |
| 18 | dilfridge@g.o |
| 19 | Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice) |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? | Marek Szuba <marecki@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? | "Sam Jorna (wraeth)" <wraeth@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? | Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts? | Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o> |