1 |
Thank you for working on this. |
2 |
|
3 |
Sergei Trofimovich wrote: |
4 |
> Can this proposal make a difference and make gentoo better and |
5 |
> easier to work with? |
6 |
> |
7 |
> Does it try to attack the right thing? |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Does it completely miss the point? |
10 |
|
11 |
I hold a perhaps radical view: I would like to simply remove stable. |
12 |
|
13 |
I continue to feel that maintaining two worlds (stable+unstable) |
14 |
carries with it an unneccessary cost. |
15 |
|
16 |
Based solely on how excellently unstable (and similar approaches before |
17 |
using Gentoo) works for me in practice, I believe that skipping stable |
18 |
and instead focusing efforts on resolving problems reported in unstable |
19 |
a little quicker would yield a much better end result - and would net |
20 |
positive dev time. |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
> Does it sound fun? |
24 |
|
25 |
Sorry, no, not to me. It sounds like "double" overhead. :\ |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
I consider dev time a precious resource. Devs should need to do as |
29 |
few things as possible, to keep things going, and should be able to |
30 |
immediately reuse as much input from the wider community as possible. |
31 |
|
32 |
More troubleshooting and fixing "hard" problems, less routine work. |
33 |
|
34 |
|
35 |
//Peter |