Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Olivier Crête" <tester@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Opinion against /usr merge
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 04:38:59
Message-Id: 1342586255.18313.45.camel@TesterTop4
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Opinion against /usr merge by Richard Yao
1 On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 23:54 -0400, Richard Yao wrote:
2 > On 07/17/2012 07:07 PM, Olivier Crête wrote:
3 > > On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 18:41 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
4 > >> If somebody really is pushing for an all-out /usr move by all means
5 > >> speak up, but I think that basically what everybody is advocating is
6 > >> trying to follow upstream for individual packages.
7 > >
8 > > As I've been saying for a while, doing a full merge of /bin, /sbin, /lib
9 > > into /usr is probably unavoidable in the long term. We should be ready
10 > > for it, and even try to do it progressively. As currently, the split is
11 > > entirely arbitrary.
12 > >
13 > > Also be ready for a merge of /bin and /sbin.. I'm sure most people can't
14 > > even explain the difference between them.
15 > >
16 >
17 > The difference is simple. You put stuff into /sbin when you do not want
18 > regular users to be able to select it via tab completion by default.
19
20 That's certainly not how te FHS explains it.
21
22 --
23 Olivier Crête
24 tester@g.o
25 Gentoo Developer

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature