Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Richard Yao <ryao@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Opinion against /usr merge
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 03:57:36
Message-Id: 50063368.8080106@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] Opinion against /usr merge by "Olivier Crête"
1 On 07/17/2012 07:07 PM, Olivier Crête wrote:
2 > On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 18:41 -0400, Rich Freeman wrote:
3 >> If somebody really is pushing for an all-out /usr move by all means
4 >> speak up, but I think that basically what everybody is advocating is
5 >> trying to follow upstream for individual packages.
6 >
7 > As I've been saying for a while, doing a full merge of /bin, /sbin, /lib
8 > into /usr is probably unavoidable in the long term. We should be ready
9 > for it, and even try to do it progressively. As currently, the split is
10 > entirely arbitrary.
11 >
12 > Also be ready for a merge of /bin and /sbin.. I'm sure most people can't
13 > even explain the difference between them.
14 >
15
16 The difference is simple. You put stuff into /sbin when you do not want
17 regular users to be able to select it via tab completion by default.

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] Opinion against /usr merge "Olivier Crête" <tester@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] Opinion against /usr merge "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>