Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 16:42:08
Message-Id: 200505171242.15421.mcummings@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org by Jeffrey Forman
1 (fearing the jeff wrath)
2
3 can we get the dup status added back in though? i know, i know, we're being
4 nitpicky, and not too many folks have stood up and applauded this effort like
5 they should have (ahem). Just...unsettling to see bugs marked as resolved -
6 make it sound like i did something rather than find that the same problem had
7 been reported a few times :)
8
9
10 On Tuesday 17 May 2005 11:47 am, Jeffrey Forman wrote:
11 > Bingo, I found the correlation between those bugs and the previous ones
12 > mentioned by Daniel. They have all been marked as duplicates of other
13 > bugs. Therefore bugzilla does not put a "resolution" in there, only
14 > marking them as status: resolved.
15 >
16 > -Jeffrey
17 >
18 > On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 11:19 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote:
19 > > Jeffrey Forman wrote:
20 > > > That seems odd, then again, those are VERY old bugs. Way before my time
21 > > > of looking at bugzilla to upgrade.
22 > >
23 > > Don't think it has anything to do with age. Just marked this one a dup
24 > > this morning.
25 > >
26 > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92539
27
28 --
29
30 -----o()o---------------------------------------------
31 Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl
32 Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net
33 -----o()o---------------------------------------------

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org Jeffrey Forman <jforman@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-dev] UPGRADE complete bugs.gentoo.org Michael Cummings <mcummings@g.o>