1 |
(fearing the jeff wrath) |
2 |
|
3 |
can we get the dup status added back in though? i know, i know, we're being |
4 |
nitpicky, and not too many folks have stood up and applauded this effort like |
5 |
they should have (ahem). Just...unsettling to see bugs marked as resolved - |
6 |
make it sound like i did something rather than find that the same problem had |
7 |
been reported a few times :) |
8 |
|
9 |
|
10 |
On Tuesday 17 May 2005 11:47 am, Jeffrey Forman wrote: |
11 |
> Bingo, I found the correlation between those bugs and the previous ones |
12 |
> mentioned by Daniel. They have all been marked as duplicates of other |
13 |
> bugs. Therefore bugzilla does not put a "resolution" in there, only |
14 |
> marking them as status: resolved. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> -Jeffrey |
17 |
> |
18 |
> On Tue, 2005-05-17 at 11:19 -0400, Aaron Walker wrote: |
19 |
> > Jeffrey Forman wrote: |
20 |
> > > That seems odd, then again, those are VERY old bugs. Way before my time |
21 |
> > > of looking at bugzilla to upgrade. |
22 |
> > |
23 |
> > Don't think it has anything to do with age. Just marked this one a dup |
24 |
> > this morning. |
25 |
> > |
26 |
> > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92539 |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
|
30 |
-----o()o--------------------------------------------- |
31 |
Michael Cummings | #gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl |
32 |
Gentoo Perl Dev | on irc.freenode.net |
33 |
-----o()o--------------------------------------------- |