| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA1 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
Lance Albertson wrote: |
| 5 |
> Nathan L. Adams wrote: |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>>>>It is listed in the MOTD on the installation media. I'm not making any |
| 9 |
>>>>assumptions on this. It's really not our fault when the user base |
| 10 |
>>>>doesn't read what is sitting in front of them, plainly on the screen. |
| 11 |
>>>> |
| 12 |
>>>>Thank you for proving my point. |
| 13 |
>>>> |
| 14 |
>> |
| 15 |
>> |
| 16 |
>>And what point would that be exactly? Console messages are ineffective? |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> That you haven't completely read documentation that was right on your |
| 20 |
> screen. I mean *read*, not glanced. I've finally read through ciaranm's |
| 21 |
> GLEP and I get the impression you only skimmed through it. I suggest you |
| 22 |
> stick with exact wording from the GLEP for discussion on this thread |
| 23 |
> rather than assumptions made on arguments. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Cheers- |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
Actually, Lance, I have read it. Where does it say anything about a |
| 29 |
central web repository for the docs in question? Where does it specify |
| 30 |
the format of those? It doesn't. It assumes that all Gentoo officially |
| 31 |
cares about is the emerge --news output. Any external docs can live |
| 32 |
anywhere in any format. Users have asked for a central location for |
| 33 |
these documents and the transient nature of your current local portage |
| 34 |
tree doesn't give that. |
| 35 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 36 |
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
iD8DBQFDa5cY2QTTR4CNEQARAhBcAJ4oT9Wwf5ohK4prQgDSQNGCKoE3WwCeNCct |
| 39 |
C16jLYYC4zKemRdzcJFNrr4= |
| 40 |
=IQ1Y |
| 41 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives