Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Mike Frysinger <vapier@g.o>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] cleaning out 'bc' and 'ed' from system
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 21:54:06
Message-Id: 200504221754.31634.vapier@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] cleaning out 'bc' and 'ed' from system by David Klaftenegger
1 On Friday 22 April 2005 05:49 pm, David Klaftenegger wrote:
2 > Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
3 > > On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:29:58 -0700 Drake Wyrm <wyrm@×××××.com> wrote:
4 > > | While you're at it, get rid of nano, too. None of the packages
5 > > | *require* it, either. That would save almost 800k! Woo!
6 > >
7 > > nano isn't in system.
8 >
9 > # emerge -pve system | grep nano
10 > [ebuild N ] app-editors/nano-1.3.4 -build -debug -justify +ncurses
11 > +nls -nomac -slang -spell 0 kB
12 >
13 > well, I suppose it is.
14
15 you did not specify the virtual/editor on your system so portage picked the
16 default which is nano
17
18 if your system isnt sufficiently configured, nano will be part of `emerge
19 system`, but really that isnt *our* fault now is it ? :P
20 -mike
21 --
22 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-dev] cleaning out 'bc' and 'ed' from system David Klaftenegger <davidweb@××××××××××××.de>
Re: [gentoo-dev] cleaning out 'bc' and 'ed' from system Drake Wyrm <wyrm@×××××.com>