Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: David Klaftenegger <davidweb@××××××××××××.de>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] cleaning out 'bc' and 'ed' from system
Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2005 21:57:08
Message-Id: 4269738B.4080909@klaftenegger.de
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-dev] cleaning out 'bc' and 'ed' from system by Mike Frysinger
1 Mike Frysinger wrote:
2 > On Friday 22 April 2005 05:49 pm, David Klaftenegger wrote:
3 >
4 >>Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
5 >>
6 >>>On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:29:58 -0700 Drake Wyrm <wyrm@×××××.com> wrote:
7 >>>| While you're at it, get rid of nano, too. None of the packages
8 >>>| *require* it, either. That would save almost 800k! Woo!
9 >>>
10 >>>nano isn't in system.
11 >>
12 >> # emerge -pve system | grep nano
13 >>[ebuild N ] app-editors/nano-1.3.4 -build -debug -justify +ncurses
14 >>+nls -nomac -slang -spell 0 kB
15 >>
16 >>well, I suppose it is.
17 >
18 >
19 > you did not specify the virtual/editor on your system so portage picked the
20 > default which is nano
21 >
22 > if your system isnt sufficiently configured, nano will be part of `emerge
23 > system`, but really that isnt *our* fault now is it ? :P
24 > -mike
25
26 no, but where is that documented?
27
28 well, another thing to learn about :-)
29
30 thanks.
31 --
32 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list