1 |
On 06/19/2013 09:15 PM, gmt@×××××.us wrote: |
2 |
> Sorry to hear you have such a low opinion of the socialization of Gentoo |
3 |
> developers. Since I'm not one of them, I'll just put forth my 2c in on |
4 |
> this, without fear of "consequences." |
5 |
|
6 |
Yet even users not behaving will get a friendly warning and might be |
7 |
restricted in their access to our media. |
8 |
|
9 |
> Am I the only one who feels that trolling, abuse, and so forth, are largely |
10 |
> in the eye of the beholder, and that lively, impassioned, constructive |
11 |
> debate may seem to many readers like hyperbole and ad hominem attack? |
12 |
|
13 |
So better to try to think twice and write when you are sure you are as |
14 |
clear as possible =) |
15 |
|
16 |
> As long as I can remember, candid and even ostensibly hostile debate and |
17 |
> argument have been a part of the Gentoo process (the same goes for a great |
18 |
> many open-source projects). Thus far, although not without some frustration |
19 |
> and angst, Gentoo has weathered these storms, and somehow managed to make |
20 |
> sound decisions based on technical and practical merit, after all is said |
21 |
> and done. |
22 |
|
23 |
Sure, but since we are getting more and more people burnt by the process |
24 |
and nothing is gained or lost between: |
25 |
|
26 |
"You suck and this idea is not going to fly at all" |
27 |
|
28 |
and |
29 |
|
30 |
"I'm sure it will not work" |
31 |
|
32 |
> Have you considered the possibility, Markos, that, although not pretty to |
33 |
> look at, such conflicts provide an important cathartic channel to relieve |
34 |
> certain "psychological pressures?" In environments where everyone is |
35 |
> expected, on pain of discipline, to "be civil" all the time, my experience |
36 |
> is that folks start to build up resentments which eventually "explode" |
37 |
> forth, spectacularly, despite -- indeed, one might say, because of -- their |
38 |
> best efforts to conform to those expectations. |
39 |
|
40 |
You can be direct and yet not infringe the CoC. |
41 |
|
42 |
> IIRC, Gentoo already has rules forbidding a laundry-list of antisocial |
43 |
> behaviors like racism, sexism, threats of violence, and so forth, and some |
44 |
> provisions in place to handle violators of that policy, does it not? |
45 |
|
46 |
Yes and now is being enforced fully. |
47 |
|
48 |
> Further -- and please take this as more of a rhetorical flourish than a |
49 |
> genuine concern, but, I wonder, whose job it is to muzzle you, Markos, if |
50 |
> you, yourself get out of line, and will they dare perform it? |
51 |
|
52 |
The rest of devrel still does have full power, the quick action of the |
53 |
devrel leader is just a in between once we got to agree on the |
54 |
quick-action protocol. We have a lengthy procedure for major |
55 |
infringement and it doesn't work for small infringements. |
56 |
|
57 |
> Has a clear consensus emerged that existing rules are not strong enough? |
58 |
|
59 |
Is not a matter of rules, but procedures to enforce the rules. |
60 |
|
61 |
> Or perhaps, are a vocal minority just butt-hurt about some particular |
62 |
> discussion that happened recently? I'm asking fully in earnest, and I |
63 |
> sincerely hope -- and genuinely presume -- I don't have to worry that I'll |
64 |
> be muzzled for doing so, on the basis that I'm "trolling" or what-have-you. |
65 |
|
66 |
No minorities had been considered, vocal or silent. |
67 |
|
68 |
> Why should I even feel the need to say so? Perhaps, that is my problem and |
69 |
> sheer paranoia, but surely, you can appreciate how such an announcement can |
70 |
> potentially have certain "chilling effects," and that the merits of strict |
71 |
> enforcement of such well-intended policies are not necessarily so clear as |
72 |
> they might seem on first glance. |
73 |
|
74 |
Having a gentler tone would just keep the technical field less prone to |
75 |
be encrusted with pointless emotional hindrances. Everybody likes to |
76 |
side between Good and Evil, here we should just have Working and Broken. |
77 |
|
78 |
lu |
79 |
|
80 |
PS: I'd advise to try to tone down another notch your vocabulary if you |
81 |
are afraid of getting some penalty for foul language. |