| 1 |
On Thu, 14 May 2009 21:24:14 +0200 |
| 2 |
Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> > "so with glep55 caching it is actually slower!" |
| 4 |
> > |
| 5 |
> > There's no possible way that can make sense. Whatever he's claiming |
| 6 |
> > by that is obviously nonsense. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Ah. I was not precise enough. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Let me rephrase it in less ambiguous terms then - |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> "Having EAPI in the ebuild is slower than having it encoded in the |
| 13 |
> filename" |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Counterpoint: No, you use caching if it is that darn slow |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Cache it where? There's already a cache, and introducing any new cache |
| 18 |
will only slow things down, not speed them up. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
And you still haven't justified how glep 55 makes it slower. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
-- |
| 23 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives