| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> So you're volunteering to convert the entire tree to the new EAPI all |
| 3 |
> in one go every two months? |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
I don't see the need and I won't see the problem given right now what is |
| 6 |
interesting is the set of improvements that aren't forward incompatible. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
Being that the case you'd just need 2 trees, managed as overlay and a |
| 9 |
marker for each tree on which eapi to use, but I dislike empty theories |
| 10 |
or hardly searched corner cases that could be avoided with half of the |
| 11 |
effort necessary to get there. |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
lu |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Luca Barbato |
| 19 |
Gentoo Council Member |
| 20 |
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC |
| 21 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
-- |
| 24 |
gentoo-dev@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives