Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: "Federico \\\"fox\\\" Scrinzi" <fox91@×××××.no>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new "qt" category
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2013 19:16:51
Message-Id: 50F99F86.4080104@anche.no
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new "qt" category by Ben de Groot
1 On 17/01/2013 14:57, Ben de Groot wrote:
2 > Presently we already have a good number of split qt-* library packages
3 > in x11-libs.
4
5 How many?
6
7 └> ls -d /usr/portage/x11-libs/qt* | wc -l
8 22
9
10 > We, the Gentoo Qt team, are of the opinion that the time has
11 > come to split all these out into their own category.
12
13 -1
14 No way.
15
16 > This means x11-libs/qt-core will be moved to qt/core, and so on.
17
18 Do you really want me to do "emerge core"?
19
20 Moreover all other categories are called "major-minor" as Diego pointed
21 out. Consistency matters.
22
23 --
24 f.
25
26 "There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache
27 invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors."

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature