Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | Gentoo Dev <gentoo-dev@l.g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] python-utils-r1.eclass: avoid nested ebegin calls | ||
| Date: | Mon, 11 Jul 2022 17:57:35 | ||
| Message-Id: | uzghf7csd@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] python-utils-r1.eclass: avoid nested ebegin calls by Mike Gilbert |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Mon, 11 Jul 2022, Mike Gilbert wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | >> Maybe leave ebegin/eend in place then, which was invented precisely for |
| 4 | >> this use case? What's so bad about nesting it? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | > It leads to odd looking output. |
| 7 | |
| 8 | > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/portage.git/commit/?id=eba088af8f335c0adb386461e6df1267e24800e7 |
| 9 | |
| 10 | IIUC it would look like this, with the patch applied: |
| 11 | |
| 12 | * task 1 |
| 13 | * Doing task 2 ... [ ok ] |
| 14 | * task 1 succeeded |
| 15 | |
| 16 | That's not the most beautiful of outputs either. |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] python-utils-r1.eclass: avoid nested ebegin calls | Anna <cyber+gentoo@×××××.in> |
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] python-utils-r1.eclass: avoid nested ebegin calls | Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> |