| 1 |
On 10/27/2016 05:00 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
| 2 |
>>>>>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
>>> So, it is o.k. if you mention github in the Motivation section (but |
| 5 |
>>> not five times!). However, github or pull requests should be mentioned |
| 6 |
>>> neither in the Specification or the Rationale. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
>> Why not in the rationale? It is the most straightforward way of |
| 9 |
>> explaining why it's made optional like this. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> I just don't see the need there. The sentence: |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> "Due to the non-obligatory nature of GitHub, they may be requested by |
| 14 |
> the maintainers to use other contribution channels." |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> could be replaced by: |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> "Contributors using an unofficial channel may be requested by the |
| 19 |
> maintainers to use other contribution channels." |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> [BTW, is there a decent way to send diffs for a Mediawiki document?] |
| 22 |
> |
| 23 |
> Ulrich |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
IIRC, you could use USE="mediawiki" on dev-vcs/git and then use git to |
| 27 |
interface with mediawiki |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
NP-Hardass |
Archives