| 1 |
>>>>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
>> So, it is o.k. if you mention github in the Motivation section (but |
| 4 |
>> not five times!). However, github or pull requests should be mentioned |
| 5 |
>> neither in the Specification or the Rationale. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
> Why not in the rationale? It is the most straightforward way of |
| 8 |
> explaining why it's made optional like this. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
I just don't see the need there. The sentence: |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
"Due to the non-obligatory nature of GitHub, they may be requested by |
| 13 |
the maintainers to use other contribution channels." |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
could be replaced by: |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
"Contributors using an unofficial channel may be requested by the |
| 18 |
maintainers to use other contribution channels." |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
[BTW, is there a decent way to send diffs for a Mediawiki document?] |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Ulrich |
Archives