| 1 |
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 11:00:35 +0200 |
| 2 |
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> >>>>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> >> So, it is o.k. if you mention github in the Motivation section (but |
| 7 |
> >> not five times!). However, github or pull requests should be mentioned |
| 8 |
> >> neither in the Specification or the Rationale. |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> > Why not in the rationale? It is the most straightforward way of |
| 11 |
> > explaining why it's made optional like this. |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> I just don't see the need there. The sentence: |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> "Due to the non-obligatory nature of GitHub, they may be requested by |
| 16 |
> the maintainers to use other contribution channels." |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> could be replaced by: |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> "Contributors using an unofficial channel may be requested by the |
| 21 |
> maintainers to use other contribution channels." |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Used a wording closer to the current one but done. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> [BTW, is there a decent way to send diffs for a Mediawiki document?] |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I seriously doubt there's a decent way to do anything on MediaWiki. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
-- |
| 30 |
Best regards, |
| 31 |
Michał Górny |
| 32 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives