| 1 |
On Thu, 27 Oct 2016 09:55:13 +0200 |
| 2 |
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> >>>>> On Thu, 27 Oct 2016, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> > I've started writing a GLEP to formalize and confirm the current |
| 7 |
> > practices for committing third-party contributions into Gentoo. It's |
| 8 |
> > meant mostly to clear the rules for pull requests. However, the rules |
| 9 |
> > are generic enough to cover other contribution media -- patches |
| 10 |
> > attached to bugs, etc. |
| 11 |
> |
| 12 |
> > Please review the following draft: |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> > https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:MGorny/GLEP:TPC |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> I am strictly opposed to making github or pull requests part of our |
| 17 |
> official workflow or policy. |
| 18 |
> |
| 19 |
> So, it is o.k. if you mention github in the Motivation section (but |
| 20 |
> not five times!). However, github or pull requests should be mentioned |
| 21 |
> neither in the Specification or the Rationale. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
Why not in the rationale? It is the most straightforward way of |
| 24 |
explaining why it's made optional like this. |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
-- |
| 27 |
Best regards, |
| 28 |
Michał Górny |
| 29 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives