Archives
Archives
| From: | Dean Stephens <desultory@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74: Full-tree verification using Manifest files | ||
| Date: | Sat, 28 Oct 2017 02:41:42 | ||
| Message-Id: | e1208a54-3360-1b95-d353-88ae88c022eb@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74: Full-tree verification using Manifest files by "Hanno Böck" |
||
| 1 | On 10/27/17 17:48, Hanno Böck wrote: |
| 2 | > Should a package manager reject a sync if it is too old? or not install |
| 3 | > packages if a sync hasn't happened for some time? What is considered |
| 4 | > "outdated"? I think that should be clarified how exactly it's supposed |
| 5 | > to work. |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | If such a rejection is to be the default, an override option should be |
| 8 | required as part of the spec. There are use cases where using an "old" |
| 9 | repository would be necessary, even if only temporarily. |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74: Full-tree verification using Manifest files | "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org> |