Archives
Archives
| From: | "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.everitt@×××.org> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-dev@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74: Full-tree verification using Manifest files | ||
| Date: | Sat, 28 Oct 2017 03:28:14 | ||
| Message-Id: | b1433ca7-7829-3cda-9bc7-5cfbba9f4499@emjay-embedded.co.uk | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74: Full-tree verification using Manifest files by Dean Stephens |
||
| 1 | On 28/10/17 03:41, Dean Stephens wrote: |
| 2 | > On 10/27/17 17:48, Hanno Böck wrote: |
| 3 | >> Should a package manager reject a sync if it is too old? or not install |
| 4 | >> packages if a sync hasn't happened for some time? What is considered |
| 5 | >> "outdated"? I think that should be clarified how exactly it's supposed |
| 6 | >> to work. |
| 7 | >> |
| 8 | > If such a rejection is to be the default, an override option should be |
| 9 | > required as part of the spec. There are use cases where using an "old" |
| 10 | > repository would be necessary, even if only temporarily. |
| 11 | > |
| 12 | I_KNOW_WHAT_I_AM_DOING=1 |
| 13 | |
| 14 | :] |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] GLEP 74: Full-tree verification using Manifest files | Allan Wegan <allanwegan@××××××××××.de> |