Gentoo Archives: gentoo-dev

From: Duncan <1i5t5.duncan@×××.net>
To: gentoo-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Did portage 2.1 change default use flags?
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 07:41:56
Message-Id: e6r2b8$ucj$2@sea.gmane.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Did portage 2.1 change default use flags? by Peter
1 Peter <pete4abw@×××××××.net> posted
2 pan.2006.06.14.20.11.26.154886@×××××××.net, excerpted below, on Wed, 14
3 Jun 2006 16:11:26 -0400:
4
5 > I responded to this sentence:
6 >>>Interested in
7 >>>figuring out what use flags were turned off? Check out
8 >>>/usr/portage/profiles/base/use.defaults and other use.defaults files
9 >>>that correspond to your profile.
10 >
11 > I read that to mean "compare the base use.default with the other
12 > use.defaults file and note the differences." It could also read "look at
13 > the base use.default as well as the other use.default files." It was a
14 > case of semantics and an ambiguously worded sentence, not my inability to
15 > comprehend use.defaults.
16
17 <light dawns> Ooohhh, gotcha now!! You are right, that /is/ a bit
18 ambiguous. Obviously, neither I nor the author caught that.
19
20
21
22 --
23 Duncan - List replies preferred. No HTML msgs.
24 "Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
25 and if you use the program, he is your master." Richard Stallman
26
27 --
28 gentoo-dev@g.o mailing list